l The setting of the strategy target (also the policy target) is not reasonable. The strategy (or the policy) setting correctly is the precondition of the government effective execution. The strategy setting must meet following several requirements: subject, clear, concrete and feasible.
l Policy subject—government’s character orientation is wrong. Government is not omnipotent, and should not take on all the society things. The practice proved that the government’s character should do it should do or it can do, such as providing the public products, arranging the society security. The wrong orientation results in the disadvantage government execution. If the government takes part in the microscopic economy excessively, the government execution will be weakened even go to the impasse rather than strengthen it.
l The system has bug and the policy has not be standardized. The system provides the outer environment for the public policy. The defect of system often leads to the instable policy or other negative effects such as one thing managed by several departments. This obviously goes against the government strategy and policy and influences severely the government executive ability. The standardization of the strategy and policy stresses the clear of the content and the form, maintains their authority, stability and validity. Standardization means authority and government executive ability.
l There is absent of supervising and evaluating of the policy. We can’t image that he huge government system is absent of supervise and only depending on the people’s consciousness to execution the public policy and government strategy. The practice proved time and again that the successful and the effective government execution must have a strong, unique and relatively independent administrative supervision. Evaluation is another supervision, an afterwards supervision. To evaluate the results of the policy is the main content of the supervision.
l The policy edges—“majority’s tyranny “, on the rule of minority obeying majority, the minority will be ignored or harmed when their benefit is not consistent to the majority. This actually makes the policy unfair and damages the validity and identification of government.
l The crisis management policy is absent. The crisis event is paroxysmal, urgent, limited information and instable. When it breaks out, government executive ability could not carry out effectively as the government’s recourses, including system, process and policy etc. are restricted.
4 Improving public policy ability，enhance government executive ability
For changing of the disadvantage of government executive ability, elevating the ability of government public policy will strengthen it. The measures are following.
百度搜索“77cn”或“免费范文网”即可找到本站免费阅读全部范文。收藏本站方便下次阅读，免费范文网，提供经典小说英语论文The Analysis of Improvement of Government Executive Ability(4)在线全文阅读。
