77范文网 - 专业文章范例文档资料分享平台

2011年对外经贸大学翻译硕士(MTI)真题(2)

来源:网络收集 时间:2021-09-24 下载这篇文档 手机版
说明:文章内容仅供预览,部分内容可能不全,需要完整文档或者需要复制内容,请下载word后使用。下载word有问题请添加微信号:或QQ: 处理(尽可能给您提供完整文档),感谢您的支持与谅解。点击这里给我发消息

07. Roberts was raised in Georgia. Her parents ran a theater school there. Her sister and brother are also actors. The family was always short of money.
A. fragment B. choppy C. correct D. run on
08. When Julia was four years old, her parents divorced. After eighteen years of marriage.
A. fragment B. run on C. choppy D. correct
Part 3: Reading Comprehension (30 P)
Passage A
Many United States companies have, unfortunately, made the search for legal protection from import competition into a major line of work. Since 1980 the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has received about 280 complaints alleging damage from imports that benefit from subsidies by foreign governments. Another 340 charge that foreign companies “dumped” their products in the United States at “less than fair value.” Even when no unfair prac
tices are alleged, the simple claim that an industry has been injured by imports is sufficient grounds to seek relief.
Contrary to the general

impression, this quest for import relief has hurt more companies than it has helped. As corporations begin to function globally, they develop an intricate web of marketing, production, and research relationships. The complexity of these relationships makes it unlikely that a system of import relief laws will meet the strategic needs of all the units under the same parent company.
Internationalization increases the danger that foreign companies will use import relief laws against the very companies the laws were designed to protect. Suppose a United States-owned company establishes an overseas plant to manufacture a product while its competitor makes the same product in the United States. If the competitor can prove injury from the imports—and that the United States Company received a subsidy from a foreign government to build its plant abroad—the United States Company’s products will be uncompetitive in the United States, since they would be subject to duties.
Perhaps the most brazen case occurred when the ITC investigated allegations that Canadian companies were injuring the United States salt industry by dumping rock salt, used to device roads. The bizarre aspect of the complaint was that a foreign conglomerate with United States operations was crying for help against a United States company with foreign operations. The “United States” company claiming injury was a subsidiary of a Dutch conglomerate, while the “Canadian” companies included a subsidiary of a Chicago firm that was the second-largest domestic producer of rock salt.
01. The passage is chiefly concerned with ______.
A. arguing against the increased internationalization of United States corporations
B. warning that the application of laws affecting trade frequently has unintended consequences
C. demonstrating that foreign-based firms receive more subsidies from their governments than United States firms receive from the United States government
D. advocating the use of trade restrictions for “dumped” products but not for other imports
02. It can be inferred from the passage that the minimal basis for a complaint to the International Trade Commission is which of the following?
A. A foreign competitor has received a subsidy from a foreign government.
B. A foreign competitor has substantially increased the volume of products shipped to the United States.
C. A foreign competitor is selling products in the United States at less than fair market value.
D. The company requesting import relief has been injured by the sale of imports in the United States.
03. The last paragraph performs which of the following functions in the passage?
A. It summarizes the discussion thus far and suggests additional areas of research.
B. It presents a recommendation based on the evidence presented earlier.
C. It cites a s
pecific ease that illustrates a problem presented more generally in the previous paragraph.
D. It introduces an additional area of concern not

mentioned earlier.
04. The passage warns of which of the following dangers?
A. Companies in the United States may receive no protection from imports unless they actively seek protection from import competition.
B. Companies that seek legal protection from import competition may incur legal costs that far exceed any possible gain.
C. Companies that are United States owned but operate internationally may not be eligible for protection from import competition under the laws of the countries in which their plants operate.
D. Companies that are not United States owned may seek legal protection from import competition under United States import relief laws.
05. According to the passage, the International Trade Commission is involved in which of the following?
A. Investigating allegations of unfair import competition
B. Granting subsidies to eompanies in the United States that have been injured by import competition
C. Recommending legislation to ensure fair trade

百度搜索“77cn”或“免费范文网”即可找到本站免费阅读全部范文。收藏本站方便下次阅读,免费范文网,提供经典小说公务员考试2011年对外经贸大学翻译硕士(MTI)真题(2)在线全文阅读。

2011年对外经贸大学翻译硕士(MTI)真题(2).doc 将本文的Word文档下载到电脑,方便复制、编辑、收藏和打印 下载失败或者文档不完整,请联系客服人员解决!
本文链接:https://www.77cn.com.cn/wenku/gongwuyuan/1247127.html(转载请注明文章来源)

相关推荐:

Copyright © 2008-2022 免费范文网 版权所有
声明 :本网站尊重并保护知识产权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果我们转载的作品侵犯了您的权利,请在一个月内通知我们,我们会及时删除。
客服QQ: 邮箱:tiandhx2@hotmail.com
苏ICP备16052595号-18
× 注册会员免费下载(下载后可以自由复制和排版)
注册会员下载
全站内容免费自由复制
注册会员下载
全站内容免费自由复制
注:下载文档有可能“只有目录或者内容不全”等情况,请下载之前注意辨别,如果您已付费且无法下载或内容有问题,请联系我们协助你处理。
微信: QQ: