80道CDCS培训试题SAMPLE下载(5)

origin” and “GSP form A”. only the latter document is presented by the beneficiary. Would this be acceptable?

7. an L/C calls for a certificate regarding the vessel “to be issued by the carriers”. The B/L has been issued by Borneo Shipping Pte Ltd as agents for the carrier, Nyk Line. Borneo Shipping has also issued the certificate as agents for Nyk Line. Would this be acceptable?

8. an L/C calls for presentation of a copy telex/fax to the applicants giving certain information. The document presented is the beneficiary’s signed certificate that they have sent such a telex to the applicant (the certificate also lists the information sent which is accurate and complete). Would this be acceptable?

9. an L/C calls for “commercial invoice”, when presented, the invoice, which has been computer-generated, is not marked “original”, it does however bear an original manual signature. Would this be acceptable?

10. A beneficiary presents documents within the expiry date of the L/C but they contain discrepancies. The beneficiary collects the offending documents for correction (leaving the rest with the bank) and in due course presents correct documents, however, in the interim the L/C has expired. Should the bank now reject the documents for “credit expired”?

11. an L/C (which allows transshipment) calls for shipment from a UK airport. The AWB shows goods on a flight from Paris to London then transshipment to another flight from London to the ultimate destination as specified in the L/C. would this be acceptable?

12. an L/C issued in favour of a beneficiary in Galle, Srilanka calls for a certificate of origin issued by the “local chamber of commerce”, when presented it has been issued by the chamber of commerce in Colombo, srilanka. Would this be acceptable? 13. an L/C calls for ocean shipment from “western Europe to south korea”. In full utilization of the L/C, the documents presented include 3 sets of ocean B/L all showing the same vessel/voyage but 3 different ports of loading (all within western europe) and 3 different ports of discharge (all in south korea). Does this constitute evidence of partial shipment?

14. an L/C subject to UCP600 specified that the L/C number must be quoted in all documents presented. The commercial invoice did not quote the L/C no. and issuing bank refused payment. Is the issuing bank correct in its refusal? 15. is the following invoice acceptable or not?

Description of the goods in an L/C is: 1000 pieces of towels L/C amount: USD1000

Invoice presented shows: Towels: 1000 pieces

Total value: USD 1000

Samples of cap: 20 free of charge

Part Four 判断正误

1. Having transferred the full shipment/expiry dates and presentation period and made the L/C available in the transferee’s country, the first beneficiary cannot now substitute documents after the L/C has expired or late presentation occurred.

2. part shipments/drawings are prohibited unless otherwise stated in the L/C.

3. unless otherwise stated in the L/C, transport documents must show the L/C beneficiary as shipper/ consignor.

4. an L/C calls for invoices in triplicate. When presented, they are identical computer-generated documents none of which is marked original. However, this is acceptable as the L/C only stated triplicate, not original and two copies.

5. an insurance policy is acceptable in lieu of an insurance certificate and vice versa.

6. according to article 13 of UCP600, if the credit stipulates that a claiming bank must supply a certificate of compliance with the terms and conditions of the credit when making reimbursement

claim, the reimbursing bank can disregard such a stipulation. 7. a bill of lading with pre-printed wording to show that the goods have been loaded on board can simultaneously bear a dated on-board notation. In such a case the date of the on-board notation will be deemed to be the date of shipment whether it is earlier or later than the issuance date or the two are the same. 8. if the bill of lading indicates a place of receipt or taking in charge different from the port of loading, the on board notation must also include the port of loading stipulated in the credit and the name of the vessel on which the goods have been loaded, even if they have been loaded on the vessel named in the bill of lading. This provision does not apply when loading on board the vessel is indicated by pre-printed wording on the bill of lading.

9. terms such as “first class”, “well-known”, “independent”, “local”, “official”, “qualified”, “competent” and the like are ambiguous words in light of the UCP. If such terms are incorporated in the credit, banks will accept the relative document (s) as presented, provided that it appears on its face to be in compliance with the other terms and conditions of the credit.

10. as for a charter party bill of lading, banks will not examine the charter party contract to which the bill of lading is subject. But if the credit requires beneficiary(ies) to present the contract along

with other documents banks have to determine whether it is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the credit.

11. under a freely negotiable and transferable credit any bank except the issuing bank is a nominated bank. Now that the relative article of UCP600 sets a rule that only the nominated bank has the right to make the transfer, thereof any bank exclusive of the issuing bank can transfer such a credit unless otherwise stipulated. 12. without the agreement or authorization of the applicant, an issuing bank must issue a credit strictly as what the application says and cannot make any alteration even if to supplement or develop the terms in a manner necessary or desirable to permit the use of the credit.

13. if a signature and/or endorsement is required to be on a document consisting of more than one page, the signature is normally placed on the first or last page of the document, but unless the credit or the document itself indicates where a signature or endorsement is to appear, the signature or endorsement may appear anywhere on the document

14. if an L/C requires “invoice” or “one invoice” it will be understood to be a requirement for an original invoice. If an L/C requires “invoice in 1 copy”, it will be understood to be a requirement for a copy of an invoice.

百度搜索“77cn”或“免费范文网”即可找到本站免费阅读全部范文。收藏本站方便下次阅读，免费范文网，提供经典小说教育文库80道CDCS培训试题SAMPLE下载(5)在线全文阅读。